Thursday, January 10, 2008
Supporters of Paul & Obama Unite For A Recount In NH
Description/History:Ron Paul had two precincts, Sutton and Greenville, that BOTH claimed to receive ZERO votes for him in the recent New Hampshire primary.
In the same ballot Rudy Giuliani received many more votes than would be expected for a candidate with no momentum from previous primaries and very low poll numbers in a state where he did not see fit to even campaign.
Barack Obama received significantly less votes than was predicted in the vast majority of polls whilst Hillary Clinton received significantly more votes than were predicted.
This coupled with the statistical analyses demonstrating that BOTH candidates potentially lost HUGE numbers of votes when comparing hand counts to machine counts (91% of the vote in New Hampshire was machine counted) should, in the interests of ensuring that a true representation of the will of the people is reflected in the results, be enough to drive any Paul or Obama supporter to sign this petition, regardless of party or candidate affiliation.
Given that both men are running for the office of President of the United States, an office that exists solely of the people, for the people and by the people, one assumes that they will both accept this request and represent the will of the people to demand this recount should enough signatures be accumulated.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, call on Congressman Ron Paul and Junior Senator Barack Obama, in the interests of fair play and truth at the ballot boxes, to request a hand recount of ALL votes cast in the 2008 New Hampshire Primary.
Click here to sign the petition NOW!!
Thursday, December 27, 2007
I'm Baaack!!!
http://www.aaronjamesstory.com/
Northwest Airlines Racial Profiling Attack & MN Court Corruption Exposed
Mother and I Canadians returning on NWA flight 1628 Jan18/06 ,from Mayo Clinic (consult with surgeon), racially profiled (accused suspicious bag)ATTACKED: I am left in pool of blood in middle of isle... placed through secret trial (NSA, FBI and Northwest Airlines employees-ON JURY POOL-(scanned in proof to come) trial housed judge David S. Doty- X-U.S. Marine with CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST HIM- (seehttp://www.clr.org/fed-judges.html who threatened ILLEGAL HARM UPON MY FAMILY.
Monday, May 21, 2007
NWA AIRLINE / U.S. PROFILING ATTACK, SECRET- AGENT TRIAL, ILLEGAL THREATS, JUDICIAL CORRUPTION TYRANNY EXPOSED
IMPORTANT!!***Please note: any links linking to content implying harm to Bush are not our material despite the fact they have referenced our websites-we peacefully and fervently protest the actions of his administration but we do not infer physical threat.
UPDATES TWO RECENT AIRPORT FATALITIES KILLED BY AIRPORT POLICE,
AND CASE OF CIA ABDUCTION! SEE "HIGH PROFILE CASES" FURTHER BELOW FOR DETAILS
Thursday, November 15, 2007
Ron Paul Liberty Dollar Confiscated by Government Goons!
Larken Rose
http://www.larkenrose.com
Well, it was true: our wonderful protectors who work for the
federal government just pulled off a massive armed robbery. Based
on a few questions I got, I should give a little more info.
The "Liberty Dollar" is an alternative to the constantly devalued
"Federal Reserve Notes" (what most people call "dollars"). In
short, the Liberty Dollar is what all paper currency USED to be: a
representation of actual silver or gold. The Liberty Dollar comes
in coins made of precious metals, but it also comes as pieces of
paper (lots better-looking that FRN's) which represent gold and
silver. In other words, in a warehouse there is actual silver or
gold which each paper Liberty Dollar represents. So people can
trade with the paper, and they're exchanging ownership of the
actual silver or gold sitting in the warehouse.
Fed-issued currency, on the other hand, is backed by NOTHING. They
make up more constantly, out of thin air, which results in
"inflation." In short, it amounts to counterfeiting--making up new
money, which makes all the money already in circulation worth less
than it was before.
Because it is backed by silver and gold, the Liberty Dollar is
inflation-proof. In short, if we all traded in LD's, the fed would
go out of business, and inflation would disappear. And tyrants
would have a lot less power, which is why the federal Gestapo
committed armed robbery this morning on the Liberty Dollar offices:
to protect the power of tyrants.
Luckily, most of the silver and gold of Liberty Dollars is in
private hands. However, about a million dollars of the actual
silver and gold, represented by paper Liberty Dollars in the hands
of lots of different people, was stolen by the feds. In other
words, all those people holding the paper LD's were robbed of the
gold/silver which the currency represents. (So you can see why I
was more than a bit huffy in my last message.) If any lawyers are
reading this, I highly suggest an immediate, class-action motion
under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedural, to
retrieve the gold and silver owned by all those holding paper LD's.
The legal excuse for the robbery is unclear at this point, except
that a while ago the U.S. Mint made the false allegation that
Liberty Dollars might violate federal currency laws--even though
top U.S. officials have previously stated that that is NOT the
case. But the "legal" excuse is irrelevant. The real reason is the
preservation of power of megalomaniacs.
But there is another "detail" I didn't mention in my last message.
Not only does the robbery protect the Federal Reserve's fiat
currency scam, but as it happens, a rather large shipment of newly
minted Liberty Dollars, with RON PAUL'S face on them, was also
stolen. Golly gee, you don't think the Bush administration would
steal them to try to keep an ACTUAL Constitutionalist out of power,
do you? (If you don't think he would, you're an idiot.) Imagine a
TON (literally) of Liberty Dollars with Ron Paul's face on them,
circulating around the country. No wonder the federal fascists
stole them all before that could happen.
Sincerely,
Larken Rose
http://www.larkenrose.com
Big Gold & Silver Robbery!!!
From
Larken Rose
http://www.larkenrose.com
(The following is based upon recently received information, which I
assume to be accurate. A message went out, claiming to be from
Bernard von NotHaus, the "head dude" at Liberty Dollar, reporting
the following. I'll let you know if I get more confirmation of its
accuracy.)
But we neeeeeeeeeed "government" to protect us! From what? How
about from armed robbers?
Well, a dozen armed robbers just pulled off what is probably the
biggest precious metals heist in this country in a very long time.
Somewhere around a million dollars in gold, silver, and platinum
were stolen this morning by a dozen armed thugs. Unfortunately, the
crooks got away. But don't worry, the government is on the case!
Unfortunately, they're "on the case" going after the VICTIMS of
this crime. You see, the armed robbers were agents of the FBI and
the Secret Service, and the victim was the "Liberty Dollar"
organization--not to mention all the people who rightfully OWNED
the stolen property.
I probably don't have to tell you the motive: the folks at Liberty
Dollar, by offering an inflation-proof, precious-metals-backed
currency, were messing with one of the tyrants' biggest power
games: the robbery-via-"inflation" game. And in the land of the
free, this is what happens when you threaten the megalomaniacs'
power. Never mind that the Liberty Dollar is perfectly legal, as
confirmed by U.S. officials. To hell with the law; there is POWER
at stake, and you can bet that that "goddamn piece of paper" (as
Bush called the Constitution) isn't going to stop Fuhrer W. and his
jackboots from living out their little power trip fantasies.
So, are all you "limited government" Republicans proud of the
regime you created? Is this fascist empire what you wanted? Let's
see: "your" party got the House, the Senate, and the White House.
And years later, what do you have to show for it? The biggest
federal budget ever? The creation of the biggest federal
bureaucracy ever? Wow, good thing the Democrats didn't get into
power, or we'd be seeing the growth of "big government."
Wake up and smell the jackboots.
If you actually support the Bush regime, then put the damn swastika
on your sleeve and be honest about it. If, on the other hand, you
actually believe in "limited government," and you insist on
engaging in the insane ritual of voting, then how about supporting
the ONLY one in the presidential race (from either party) who ISN'T
a devout collectivist, national socialist? And I don't want to hear
any crap about "wasting your vote" on someone who can't win, or
down the road, you can proudly tell your kids how you voted for the
fascist/socialist who won, instead of the guy with PRINCIPLES who
didn't. Yeah, there's something to be proud of. Again, for those
who believe in the "election" ritual, you have two choices: Ron
Paul, or totalitarianism. I don't know how much more proof of that
you could possibly need.
Sincerely,
Larken Rose
http://www.larkenrose.com
Monday, October 29, 2007
The Accomplishments of G. W. Bush
The White House,
•I spent the
•I shattered the record for the biggest annual deficit in history
(not easy!).
•I set an economic record for the most personal bankruptcies filed in
any 12 month period.
•I set all-time record for the biggest drop in the history of the
stock market.
•In my first year in office I set the all-time record for most days
on vacation by any president in
but I did).
•After taking the entire month of August off for vacation, I presided
over the worst security failure in
•I set the record for most campaign fund raising trips by any
president in
•In my first two years in office over 2 million Americans lost their
jobs.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
This IS the MATRIX
I dare you to watch and still be the same, unless you are one of them, the elite oppressors, the planetationists.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Shaun Kranish Interviews Ed Brown Today
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
We Can!
I have seen this father and son combination before as ‘they’ competed in triathlons and it has the same effect on me whenever I see it. I get a lump in my throat as I am stunned at the physical stamina of the dad, the commitment to his son, the obvious joy on his son’s face and the profound love, on display for all the world to see, that they share.
Why is that? What chord deep within us does this story strike and cause to resonate to anyone who sees it?
I think the answer is that in these two people we see the best of the human spirit as it overcomes something much more than mere adversity. It is triumph over what could have easily been a life destined to despair. It is deep appreciation of joy, love and the spiritual value resident in every human being no matter their physical condition.
Right there in front of everyone are the factors that define and determine success. It seems to me they are: commitment, desire, effort, love, joy, shared vision and unselfish achievement to raise, not only yourself, but those around you up to extraordinary accomplishment by the single-minded pursuit of your chosen goals.
There are those who claim success is financial prosperity, political power, the imposition of their religious values on others, or world domination. They live in the facade of form. For those of us who understand that true success is in the substance, the chord of truth, it is important that we hear the ‘chord’ in this video story. And that chord, the one that resonates in us as we watch this video is extraordinary commitment fueled by unconditional love.
We know what constitutes heroic achievement when we see it and we know deeply felt passion for the immense effort required to achieve when we see it. And, when we do behold it in such purity, we weep in appreciation of it’s value.
Fill your efforts toward success with values that are lasting and timeless because they are right and good. Values that resonate with freedom and liberty for the human spirit yearning to be free. Values that others pledged their lives, fortunes and sacred honor towards. Values of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
It is the nobility found in this father and son team that we admire, respect and love. It is the nobility of our view of freedom which we possess in ourselves and long to see rise again in this land that moves us. It is the nobility of their quest that strikes a chord deep within us all as we each reach within ourselves to fulfill success in our own quests for liberty and justice for all. As this father reached deep down inside himself and drew upon a strength of character to give to his child all that he could, we also must do the same to maintain the light of liberty for our children upon this earth.
"Let us not abate our courage in doing what is right; for in due time we shall reap a reward, if we do not faint." Galatians 6:9
"Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved homes and the war's desolation,
Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the Heav'n - rescued land
Praise the Pow'r that hath made and preserved us a nation.Then conquer we must, for our cause is just,
And this be our motto--"In God is our trust."
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave."
(The fourth stanza of the Star Spangled Banner)
Our cause, our quest for liberty is just. May all of your successes be timeless, fill you with joy and lift up those around you.
The F-Scale Quiz
1. Do groups of people have rights?
a)Yes
b) No
2. Are all kinds of people intrinsically _______?
a) unequal
b) equal
3. Do all kinds of people have ______?
a) privileges
b) rights
a) groups of people
b) the person
5. Are rights ______?
a) extrinsic
b) intrinsic
6. Is group membership ______?
a) compulsary
b) voluntary
7. What is the function of a group?
a) to provide for members
b) to help members provide
To score, give yourself 1 point for every (a) answer and -1 point for every (b) answer.
Click HERE to apply score
Ed Vieira Jr. & Tim Wingate Archived Show

(CLICK IMAGE to get archived show)
Monday, October 15, 2007 Tim Wingate guest hosted on Michael Herzog’s Show the American Awakening on Republic Broadcasting Network. His guest was Dr. Edwin Vieira Jr. the author of Constitutional “Homeland Security.” Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School). They had an exciting discussion about his latest book: "Constitutional "Homeland Security," Volume One, The Nation in Arms...Friday, October 12, 2007
Won’t Back Down
(Naomi Wolf is the author of The End of America: A Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot.)
I wish people would stop breaking into tears when they talk to me these days.
I am traveling across the country at the moment — Colorado to California — speaking to groups of Americans from all walks of life about the assault on liberty and the ten steps now underway in America to a violently closed society.
The good news is that Americans are already awake: I thought there would be resistance to or disbelief at this message of gathering darkness — but I am finding crowds of people who don’t need me to tell them to worry; they are already scared, already alert to the danger and entirely prepared to hear what the big picture might look like. To my great relief, Americans are smart and brave and they are unflinching in their readiness to hear the worst and take action. And they love their country.
But I can’t stand the stories I am hearing. I can’t stand to open my email these days. And wherever I go, it seems, at least once a day, someone very strong starts to cry while they are speaking.
In Boulder, two days ago, a rosy-cheeked thirtysomething mother of two small children, in soft yoga velours, started to tear up when she said to me: `I want to take action but I am so scared. I look at my kids and I am scared. How do you deal with fear? Is it safer for them if I act or stay quiet? I don’t want to get on a list.’ In DC, before that, a beefy, handsome civil servant, a government department head — probably a Republican — confides in a lowered voice that he is scared to sign the new ID requirement for all government employees, that exposes all his most personal information to the State — but he is scared not to sign it: `If I don’t, I lose my job, my house. It’s like the German National ID card,’ he said quietly. This morning in Denver I talked for almost an hour to a brave, much-decorated high-level military leader who is not only on the watch list for his criticism of the administration — his family is now on the list. He has undertaken many dangerous combat missions in his service to his country over the course of his career, but his voice cracks when he talks about the possibility that he is exposing his children to harassment.
Jim Spencer, a former columnist for the Denver Post who has been critical of the Bush administration, told me today that I could use his name: he is on the watch list. An attorney contacts me to say that she told her colleagues at the Justice Department not to torture a detainee; she says she then faced a criminal investigation, a professional referral, saw her emails deleted — and now she is on the watch list. I was told last night that a leader of Code Pink, the anti-war women’s action group, was refused entry to Canada. I hear from a tech guy who works for the airlines — again, probably a Republican — that once you are on the list you never get off. Someone else says that his friend opened his luggage to find a letter from the TSA saying that they did not appreciate his reading material. Before I go into the security lines, I find myself editing my possessions. In New York’s LaGuardia, I reluctantly found myself putting a hardcover copy of Tara McKelvey’s excellent Monstering, an expose of CIA interrogation practices, in a garbage can before I get in the security line; it is based on classified information. This morning at my hotel, before going to the airport, I threw away a very nice black T-shirt that said `We Will Not be Silenced’ — with an Arabic translation — that someone had given me, along with a copy of poems written by detainees at Guantanamo.
In my America we are not scared to get in line at the airport. In my America, we will not be silenced.
More times than I can count, courageous and confident men and women who are telling me about speaking up, but who are risking what they see as the possible loss of job, home or the ability to pay for grown kids’ schooling, start to choke up. Yesterday a woman in one gathering started to cry simply while talking about the degradation of her beloved country.
And always the questions: what do we do?
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Feds seek Brown sympathizers

By SCOTT BROOKS
New Hampshire Union Leader Staff
Manchester – Federal marshals are combing New Hampshire and other parts of the country for Ed and Elaine Brown sympathizers suspected of plotting violence in retaliation for the Plainfield couple's arrest last week.
In Manchester, marshals have questioned several members of the Free State Project, a group of small-government activists that includes some of the Browns' most ardent supporters. In one interview that was videotaped and posted online, an agent identified one Free Stater, Rob Jacobs, 42, of Manchester, as a potential threat.
Read more here.
Ed Brown delivered to Ohio prison
By Beverley Wang, Associated Press Writer | October 10, 2007
CONCORD, N.H. --After 10 months of self-imposed exile at his castle-like home, authorities Wednesday delivered convicted New Hampshire tax evader Ed Brown to his new home -- a federal prison in Ohio.
Stephen Monier, U.S. Marshal for New Hampshire, said Brown arrived late morning at the low security Federal Correctional Institution in Elkton, Ohio. His wife, Elaine Brown, arrived at minimum security federal prison in Danbury, Conn., earlier this week.
Both were sentenced to 63-month prison terms in April, following their conviction in January of scheming to avoid federal income taxes by hiding $1.9 million of income between 1996 and 2003. But the couple -- who believe the federal income tax is not legitimate -- had eluded arrest for months, refusing to leave their hill-top home located on 110 acres in rural Plainfield. They were finally arrested last week, taken into custody by officers posing as visiting supporters.
Monier said Ed Brown, 65, had not spent any time in a New Hampshire jail since his arrest, but had been staying at undisclosed loactions under watch of marshal's deputies on his way to prison via the government's prisoner transportation system.
Supporters of the Browns had begun to question the whereabouts of Ed Brown, noting he had been listed as not in custody of the federal Bureau of Prisons. On at least one blog friendly to the Browns, http://edbrownvlog.blogspot.com, supporters wondered whether "Brown has been disappeared into a black hole and is being mistreated or even tortured."
Asked Wednesday about the message, Monier dismissed it outright. "That's absolutely ludicrous," he said.
Monday, October 08, 2007
WHERE IS Edward Lewis; Brown???
If they're alive, where are the Mugshots?

Union Leader: 800-562-8218
U.S. Marshal's office: 603-225-1632
Concord Monitor: 603-224-5301 ext. 670
(1) Where are the Mugshots of Ed and Elaine?
We need proof that they are alive.
(2) Why is Ed Brown not in BOP custody?
(3) What is the exact chain of custody?
(4) Are Ed and Elaine Brown Alive and in Good Health?
If yes, release the Mugshots as proof of life.
Sunday, October 07, 2007
We would like everyone who can to give the U.S. Marshal's office in New Hampshire a call and ask them to locate Ed. Ask why Ed has not been handed over to to the Federal Bureau of Prisons yet. Ask them how Ed is being treated, if he has been hospitalized, if he's still alive even (we have no way of knowing), if he is being submitted to "diesel therapy" as described in the last post we made. Take down names, employee numbers, dates/times to reference the call, whatever you can to have a record! DEMAND for answers! They've got Ed like they always wanted, why isn't he handed over to the prison? WHAT ARE THEY DOING TO HIM? HOW IS HE BEING TREATED?!?! We don't and can't give legal advice of any kind. We believe it may be perfectly "legal" or lawful to record your conversations with the Marshal's office if you tell them that you are recording. If you do, you can send us the sound file or post it on the Internet somewhere. WE NEED A RECORD. Please read the following story about how Fascist FEDGOV treated former Congressman George Hansen to see what we mean by diesel therapy!!!. U.S. Marshall''s office 603-225-1632 Where Are Ed and Elaine? Is Ed being TORTURED?Click here for more.
Friday, October 05, 2007
Host a Sons of Liberty Seminar
Practical Ways to Resist Tyranny
You Will Learn:
* Who You Are
* Why You Do What You Do
* Your Resistance Style; The Mole, The Agitator, The Ghost, or The Resister?
* Monkey Wrenching - Fighting smarter, not harder.
* Resistance Tactics: Little Foxes, Fleabites, Simon Jestering, Radio-activism.
You will leave knowing the best way to be you to fight for Freedom!
How A Secret Society of Rebel Americans Made Its Mark on Early America!
Shrouded in secrecy, the origins of the Sons of Liberty began in Boston, Massachusetts through the leadership of one Samuel Adams (a well known American Revolutionary firebrand) in early 1765. For reasons of safety and secrecy, Sons of Liberty groups tended to meet late at night so as not to attract attention and detection of British officials and the American Loyalist supporters of the British Crown.
Although the movement began as a secret society, for reasons of safety and anonymity, the organization quickly sought to build a broad, public base of political support among the colonists. Even though the Sons seldom looked for violent solutions and eruptions, however sometimes, the actions and reactions of the Sons of Liberty took a violent turn. Tarring and feathering Loyalists, royal tax collectors, and other officials-- was a common practice carried out by the more radical elements of the organizations. Whatever they did they continued to elicit and promote political upheaval that tended to favor crowd action.
It was the Boston Committee of Correspondence that directed the Boston Tea Party action of December 16, 1773. Upset with the lack of redress concerning the new tax on tea established by the British government for importation of tea to Boston, a small band of the Boston Committee of Correspondence members (approximately fifty in number) lead by Samuel Adams, proceeded to empty three ships worth and 342 chests of tea into Boston Harbor in protest.
Were they a terrorist organization? The British certainly believed they were. After all, the Sons were advocating overthrow of the status quo government and independence for the thirteen colonies. Were they a patriotic organization? Many American colonists certainly believed they were. The Sons represented to them the American freedom fighter personified, fighting for their rights and ultimate independence. It should be noted that the Loyalists also had their version of Committees of Correspondence and Sons of Liberty namely: the United Empire Loyalists.
Finally, the decision on the Sons of Liberty comes down to a variation on an old saying "one man's terrorist is another man's patriot."
Have Seminar Will Travel: I am available to conduct this seminar on your site. Contact me: MitEtagniw@gmail.com
Thursday, October 04, 2007
Buy and DO the Seize Liberty Freedom Package
Greetings Friends of Freedom!
Thank you for responding to our call for a restoration of the Republic by a resistance of Freedom minded patriots.
Send your order for The Seize Liberty Freedom Package with a gift of substance equivalent to 50 Federal Reserve Notes in: FRNs, silver, gold, POMO (Blank Post Office Money Orders), postage stamps, gift cards to national retailers to:
Seize Liberty
105 E. Vallette #1122
Elmhurst, IL 60126
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Seize Liberty Freedom Package - Tools for Resistance to Tyranny.
For a gift of substance equivalent to 50 Federal Reserve Notes in: FRNs, silver, gold, POMO (Blank Post Office Money Orders), postage stamps, gift cards to national retailers.
You will be sent to the address that you provide:
The Freedom Fighter's Manual on a disk for you to download, copy, print and distribute as you wish.
Published by the CIA in the 1980's, the Freedom Fighter's Manual was a fifteen page booklet airdropped over Nicaragua. It enumerated several methods by which the average citizen could cause disorder.
179 Things to Do 'Til the Revolution
by Claire Wolfe
In this entertaining, hard-hitting book, Wolfe outlines 27 things you can quit wasting your time on right now, 43 ways to not cooperate with tyrants, 31 ideas to increase your independence from the State, 30 means to take part in "agitation for outlaws," 34 monkeywrenching tips and, finally, 14 last-ditch paths to take if it ever comes down to resistance or total submission.
Guns, computers, identity documents, taxes. Engaging in civil disobedience, operating in the black market, going deep underground—Wolfe covers it all. These are not far-out, impractical ideas but 179 things that anyone with the proper motivation and determination can do today to help beat back the tide of tyranny. 8 1/2 x 11, softcover, 216 pp.
Also,
Invisible Resistance to Tyranny
by Jefferson Mack
What is invisible resistance to tyranny? It is an underground movement of secret freedom fighters, each acting individually and independently to ignore, evade, resist and thwart the increasingly heavy hand of government power. Invisible resisters do not join protest groups, stand on street corners making speeches or run with a mob throwing rocks at police vehicles. Rather, they make up a collective silent insurgency that tyrants won't be able to put down because they won't be able to find it. Government enforcers will fruitlessly look for organizations with no members, commanders who aren't there, secret headquarters that don't exist and couriers that carry no messages.
Invisible Resistance to Tyranny is both a manifesto and manual for everyday citizens who are alarmed by the never-ending encroachment upon the individual freedoms recognized by the Bill of Rights and who want to do something about it now before it comes down to a choice between violent revolution and total submission. It outlines a progressive program of resistance that anyone can undertake without having to protest in the streets, go on hunger strikes or take up arms. It tells how to: be a "bad" citizen while still being a good neighbor. identify and nurture sympathizers and build a network of invisible resisters. confront and convert "government supremacists" to your side. disrespect politicians and bureaucrats without drawing attention to yourself. actively resist within today's system through such avenues as taxes, guns, juries and schools.
It then provides ideas for the many paths of invisible resistance to tyranny - intelligence collection and dissemination, propaganda, support for active operations and, if it should ever come down to it, direct operations against a totalitarian regime.
Send your order for The Seize Liberty Freedom Package with a gift of substance equivalent to 50 Federal Reserve Notes in: FRNs, silver, gold, POMO (Blank Post Office Money Order), postage stamps, or gift cards to national retailers to:
Seize Liberty
105 E. Vallette #1122
Elmhurst, IL 60126
Freedom Shenanigan #17
All people create some form of government. Mankind has always had some form of organization for cooperative efforts. Some under compulsion, some voluntary.
What form does it take? Does it necessarily have to take on the appearance and function of diluted monarchy? Is it a voluntary organization? Or, is one compelled against one's will at the point of a sword to participate, genuflecting in silent compliance or else? Who institutes it and how?
Ultimately, it is what government does that determines its legitimacy.
I agree with the unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America that "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. - That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, - That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
Therefore, since this present form of FEDGOV has become worse than that of old King George, the same principles that drove the founding fathers should drive us as well. However, not all are to the personal point of moral and philosophical separation from this form of government. We are in a philosophical war for the hearts, minds and will of our countrymen. It is no different philosophically now than the battle for the hearts, minds and will in the 1760s.
The question has always been on the nature of government. The societal awareness, the group mind if you will, evolved from beyond the concept of divine right, heredity, religious institutional control and monarchical ownership. It evolved because of the fervor, passion and willingness to resist the old order. Just as the Declaration of Independence listed the wrongs perpetrated by King George that justified separation, we also must wake up to the wrongs perpetrated by FEDGOV that have exceeded those of King George and that also give as much if not more justification for separation from this form of government.
We would not be the first of our countrymen to come to reasons for separation. However, they took up arms and we cannot, yet. In spite of how justified their economic and political reasons were they faulted on the moral philosophy in their hypocrisy of whom freedom and liberty applied to. We also cannot fault on this as well.
What we can do is vanguard a new enlightenment of personal liberty and voluntary cooperation. It must be done without hypocrisy and apply to everyone. The cause is not lost, it is only smoldering in the zeitgeist, the group subconscious cultural mind of our people. They have the words, ideas, and beliefs, the moral and philosophical fuel for freedom. However, it is being suppressed with the wet blanket of belief that what they have is all that they may obtain and in some circumstances relinquish for security.
"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.” - Samuel Adams
This IS a war for independence. However, before any arms are taken up in defense of freedom the war of words and will must be waged in the hearts and minds of the people. They will eventually come to a crossroads as our founders did. Each one of us must make a decision of which way to go. Which way they turn is partially up to us. Just as our founders confronted an insecure future for their unique freedom venture and pressed on, we also must harden our philosophy, will and way to press on for a liberal liberty and not a hologram of freedom. However, our message must be clear, bold and new.
Thomas Jefferson said that, "When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."
Also, "Our contest is not only whether we ourselves shall be free, but whether there shall be left to mankind an asylum on earth for civil and religious liberty.” -Samuel Adams.
Furthermore, "Honour, justice and humanity call upon us to hold, and to transmit to our posterity, that liberty, which we received from our ancestors. It is not our duty to leave wealth to our children: but it is our duty, to leave liberty to them. No infamy, iniquity, or cruelty can exceed our own, if we, born and educated in a country of freedom, entitled to its blessings, and knowing their value, pusillanimously deserting the post assigned to us by Divine Providence, surrender succeeding generations to a condition of wretchedness, from which no human efforts, in all probability, will be sufficient to extricate them; the experience of all states mournfully demonstrating to us, that when arbitrary power has been established over them, even the wisest and bravest nations, that ever flourished, have, in a few years, degenerated into abject and wretched vassals." (from the Resolutions of Committee for the Province of Pennsylvania - 1774)
Therefore, we must wage the precursor war of competing philosophies and moralities NOW if we ever hope to see a relatively peaceful metamorphoses into a liberty society. We must wage a war of ideas against an enemy with superior numbers and finances. It must be an intellectual guerilla war attacking the weak points of this culture of limited liberty.
We must encourage and supply the philosophical, moral and patriotic reasoning as the foundation for the reformation of the government of the USA. The pendulum must be returned away from the abuses of Federal central government back toward the intent of the Articles of Confederation. This “Federal Constitutional” experiment has proven to be a failure in limiting central government. Therefore, since this present government has continually usurped, eroded and infringed on rights we have a right and duty to alter or abolish it and for a new government that will secure individual rights as per the Declaration of Independence.
It is clear, therefore, that it is time to rethink traditional strategy and tactics when it comes to opposing a modern police state. America is quickly moving into a long dark night of police state tyranny, where the rights now accepted by most, as being inalienable will disappear. Let the coming night be filled with a thousand points of resistance. Like the fog that forms when conditions are right and disappears when they are not, so must the resistance to tyranny be.
The liberty method of this philosophical, moral and patriotic resistance is:
Leaderless Resistance
The concept of Leaderless Resistance was proposed by Col. Ulius Louis Amoss, on April 17, 1962. Fearful of a possible Communist take-over of the United States of America, Col. Amoss propounded this doctrine as an effective means of resistance that the American people should utilize against a Soviet-style tyranny. Essentially, this doctrine holds that the most effective opposition against an oppressive tyranny is to have a movement that is as decentralized as possible with no central leadership.
The concept of Leaderless Resistance is nothing less than a fundamental departure in theories of organization. The orthodox scheme of organization, both for government as well as opposition organizations, is diagrammatically represented by the pyramid, with the mass of followers at the bottom and the leader at the top. This fundamental method of organization is to be seen not only in armies, which are of course, the best illustration of the pyramid structure, with the mass of soldiery at the bottom responsible to corporals who are in turn responsible to sergeants, and so on up the entire chain of command to the generals at the top.
This scheme of organization, the pyramid, is however, not only useless, but extremely dangerous for the participants when it is utilized in a resistance movement against state tyranny. This is more so in technologically advanced societies where electronic surveillance can often penetrate the structure revealing its chain of command. Experience has revealed over and over again that anti-state; political organizations utilizing this pyramid method of command and control are easy prey for government infiltration, entrapment, and destruction of the personnel involved. This has been seen repeatedly in the “Patriot Movement,” and its variations of legal reform, truth in taxation, jury nullification, and militia groups, where pro-government infiltrators or agent provocateurs weasel their way into patriotic groups and destroy them from within.
In the pyramid type of organization, an infiltrator can destroy anything that is beneath his level of infiltration and often those above him as well. If the traitor has infiltrated at the top, then the entire organization from the top down is compromised and may be traduced at will. The entire movement is thus wiped out in one stroke.
An alternative to the pyramid type of organization is the cell system. In the past, many political groups have used the cell system to further their objectives. The best example is the American Revolution and its "committees of correspondence" which were formed throughout the thirteen colonies. Their purpose was to subvert the government and thereby aid the cause of independence. The "Sons of Liberty", who made a name for themselves by dumping government, taxed tea into the harbor at Boston, were the action arm of the committees of correspondence. Each committee was a secret cell that operated totally independently of the other cells - an excellent example of `Leaderless Resistance'. Information on the government was passed from committee to committee, from colony to colony, and then acted upon on a local basis. It is notable that the response of the committees, despite the complete lack of a central leadership, was remarkably similar from cell to cell. It was, as the first American patriots knew, totally unnecessary for anyone to give an order for anything. Information was made available to each committee, and each committee acted as it saw fit.
From the above discussion it is clear that the pyramid type of organization can be penetrated quite easily and it thus is not a sound method of organization in situations where the government has the resources and desire to penetrate the structure; which is the situation in the Indian Union. It is evident that the best model is that of Col. Amoss who proposed the "Phantom Cell" mode of organization. This he described as Leaderless Resistance. A system of organization that is based upon the cell organization, but does not have any central control or direction, that is in fact almost identical to the methods used by the Committees of Correspondence during the American Revolution. Utilizing the Leaderless Resistance concept, all individuals and groups operate independently of each other, and never report to a central headquarters or single leader for direction or instruction, as would those who belong to a typical pyramid organization.
At first glance, such a type of organization seems unrealistic, primarily because there appears to be no organization. The natural question thus arises as to how are the "Phantom cells" and individuals to cooperate with each other when there is no intercommunication or central direction? The answer to this question is that participants in a program of Leaderless Resistance through phantom cell or individual action must know exactly what they are doing, and how to do it. It becomes the responsibility of the individual to acquire the necessary skills and information as to what is to be done. This is by no means as impractical as it appears, because it is certainly true that in any movement, all persons involved have the same general outlook, are acquainted with the same philosophy, and generally react to given situations in similar ways. The pervious history of the committees of correspondence during the American Revolution shows this to be true.
Since the entire purpose of Leaderless Resistance is to defeat state tyranny (at least insofar as this essay is concerned), all members of phantom cells or individuals will tend to react to objective events in the same way through usual tactics of resistance. Organs of information distribution such as newspapers, leaflets, computers, etc., which are widely available to all, keep each person informed of events, allowing for a planned response that will take many variations. No one need issue an order to anyone. Those idealist truly committed to the cause of freedom will act when they feel the time is ripe, or will take their cue from others who precede them. While it is true that much could be said against this type of structure as a method of resistance, it must be kept in mind that Leaderless Resistance is a child of necessity. The alternatives to it have been show to be unworkable or impractical. Leaderless Resistance has worked before in the American Revolution, and if the truly committed put it to use for themselves, it will work now.
It goes almost without saying that Leaderless Resistance leads to very small or even one-man cells of resistance. Those who join organizations to play "let's pretend" or who are "groupies" will quickly be weeded out. While for those who are serious about their opposition to federal despotism, this is exactly what is desired.
Conversely, the last thing Governments would want are a thousand different small phantom cells opposing them. It is easy to see why. Such a situation is an intelligence nightmare for government intent upon knowing everything they possibly can about those who oppose them. The Government able to amass overwhelming strength of numbers, manpower, resources, intelligence gathering, and capability at any given time needs only a focal point to direct their anger. A single penetration of a pyramid type of organization can lead to the destruction of the whole. Whereas, Leaderless Resistance presents no single opportunity for the Federals to destroy a significant portion of the Resistance.
This is the concept of the Seize Liberty Package. Tools for you to learn how to do what may have to be done.
Here is a small excerpt.
| INVISIBLE RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY |
| How to Lead a Secret Life of Insurgency in an Increasingly Unfree World |
| |
| by Jefferson Mack |
|
|
| What is invisible resistance to tyranny? It is an underground movement of secret freedom fighters, each acting individually and independently to ignore, evade, resist and thwart the increasingly heavy hand of government power. Invisible resisters do not join protest groups, stand on street corners making speeches or run with a mob throwing rocks at police vehicles. Rather, they make up a collective silent insurgency that tyrants won't be able to put down because they won't be able to find it. Invisible Resistance to Tyranny is both a manifesto and manual for everyday citizens who are alarmed by the never-ending encroachment upon the individual freedoms recognized by the Bill of Rights and who want to do something about it now before it comes down to a choice between violent revolution and total submission. |
CARPE LIBERTAS!!















